RE: ILE conversion

Hmm...never thought about using the default activation group, always did it
*caller.  I can see some good reasons for doing it, although I think some
people might disagree, and some of them loudly.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Bipes [mailto:chris.bipes@cross-check.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 11:45 AM
> To: 'MIDRANGE-L@MIDRANGE.COM'
> Subject: RE: ILE conversion
> 
> 
> But are you just converting to RPGIV from III?  If you still 
> compile to the
> default activation group you do not get the ILE performance 
> hit or file
> override problems that can crop up in the ILE environment.  
> We converted all
> to RPGIV and make it ILE when necessary.  Our crtxxxpgm 
> default is still
> DFTACTGRP(*YES) and we put in the Header Specs to set the appropriate
> activation group, binding directories when we need to use external
> procedures.  (Which is becoming more and more common every day.)
> 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---