RE: News/400's ClubTech section

As an intermittent contributor to midrange-l, but active reader,
I tend to agree that there is a fair amount of e-litter.  On the
few occasions I have (had the time and) replied to questions, I
have mostly answered the question-asker directly.  This (I believe)
makes the reply back quicker than the 2-hour-ish turn-around of 
midrange-l, it also reduces the e-litter.

On the whole I find that the level of e-litter is tolerable for the 
'grains of gold' it contains.  The grains of gold have saved my 
employer money, since each call to IBM Assist/400 costs 
circa GB£200; I don't waste company time smoking, so if a
little time is lost processing irrelevant midrange-l emails, I reckon 
that they come out in profit over all.

Jeff Bull, Midas-Kapiti, Slough, England.

-----Original Message-----
From: theresa.luebeck@springs.com [mailto:theresa.luebeck@springs.com]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 1:03 PM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: News/400's ClubTech section



I agree with Simon Coulter.  Well said.

Theresa Luebeck
Senior Systems Engineer
Springs Window Fashions

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---