× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: 9347
  • From: Chuck Lewis <clewis@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:33:40 -0700

Yep,

In the initial AS/400 announcement/shipment SORELY lacked any decent tape drive.
What I had heard was that IBM had contracted someone to do this and found out at
the last minute that these folks were stepping on their naughty bits (what's 
that
from ? <BG>) so IBM brought it back in house and was WAY late with anything. We
ended up getting a - gee forget the make, can't believe that ! - well anyway it
took 3480 catridges and could handle a 10 cartridge magazine !!! It was the 
size of
a LARGE refrigerator but SURE beat the 9347 we also had. Gee Al it is hard to
imagine ANYONE backing up with a 9347 in 1999 - no wonder they weren't doing it
<BG>... This 9347 is STILL in a 530 RISC machine because some of SSA's "alliance
product" (or whatever they were called) could ONLY supply stuff on 1/2" reel
tape... There is also a 3590 in this system too, by the way !

Chuck

"Al Barsa, Jr." wrote:

> At 04:52 PM 7/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You have caught me a little off guard, as I do not have my tape cheater
> chart with me.  Assuming that the 2660 was the rack mounted high-end tape
> drive announced when the AS/400 was announced, it is bigger.  It is
> one-half of a rack height, and IBM only "officially" sanctioned it in the
> top half of a 9309 model 2 rack.
>
> BTW, talk about tape drives that sucked.  This drive had less performance
> that the 3422 that it replaced on the System/38.  The 3422 was not
> initially announced on the AS/400, because there was a secret strategy at
> IBM to replace reel-to-reel with 8-mm, which, of course, failed badly You
> will notice that internal 8-mm drives are no longer available on the system.
>
> Ultimately, several actions were taken in parallel:
>
> Bus and tag support was made available on the AS/400, so that 3422 could be
> moved.  However if you analyzed the electric bills, you would realize that
> 3422s consumed more power than Three Mile Island could ever generate, and
> they were cost efficient to replace.
> Upgrades to the 2660 (I hope that number is correct - I am referring to the
> high end tape drive at the time of the AS/400s announcement in 1988) were
> made available, but from my imperical statistics, only 10% of those
> upgrades functioned properly.
> The 3422 was IBM's fastest (reel-to-reel) tape drive to ever rewind, using
> more power than it taked to move the space shuttle (vertically from rest on
> earth).
> IBM moved to move more advanced tape platforms to the AS/400.  The 3490's
> were first, followed by the enhanced (36 track) versions of this
> platform.  Later advancements like the 3570/3590 came out in the reverse 
>order.
>
> Al - in London
> >So, which was bigger, the 9347 or the 2660?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Bob_Voltz@Biometmail.com on 07/11/2000 04:04:03 PM
> >Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
> >To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
> >cc:
> >Fax to:
> >Subject:        RE: 9347
> >
> >
> >
> >The 9347 is a large (almost 6 feet tall) stand-alone 1/2" reel-to-reel tape
> >drive.  NOT rack-mounted.  I know, I have one.
> >The 9348 is the rack-mount slide-in 1/2" tape drive.
> >
> >
> >+---
> >| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> >| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> >| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> >| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> >+---
> >
> >
> >+---
> >| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> >| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> >| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> >| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> >+---
>
> +--------------------------------------------------+
> | Please do not send private mail to this address. |
> | Private mail should go to barsa@ibm.net.         |
> +--------------------------------------------------+
>
> Al Barsa, Jr. - Account for Midrange-L
> Barsa Consulting, LLC.
> 400 > 390
>
> Phone:          914-251-1234
> Fax:            914-251-9406
> http://www.barsaconsulting.com
> http://www.taatool.com
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.