Re: Compression vs compaction for SAV

Don,

I find it interesting, too. Our zip compression algorithm regularly gets 
about 60 percent compression on a save file that is *already* compressed.

Patrick

At 11:51 AM 5/24/2000 -0400, Don wrote:


>Dumb question du jour:
>
>Out of curiosity, if you use compressions on the 400 you get about a 1.7:1
>ration, but if you use compaction you get a 3:1 ratio.
>
>Now, this begs the question, why doesn't IBM improve the compression
>algorithm used to in effect be the compaction algorithm as we get alot
>better media utilization...?
>
>What am I not seeing here???
>
>Don in DC
>
>+---
>| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
>+---

---
IBM AS/400 communications, FTP automation, and network security
software and consulting services.

http://www.patownsend.com
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---