RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count

v4r3 isn't bad.  Are all other things equal?





DBale@lear.com on 05/09/2000 12:22:51 PM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
cc:      
Fax to: 
Subject:        RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count

The two boxes involved in my latest testing are both at V4R3.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Berendt [SMTP:rob@dekko.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 6:10 PM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count
> 
> Dan, what version of OS/400 are you running?  I forget.  There 
> have been numerous enhancements to TCP/IP over the years.  All 
> things being equal between the 400's, then TCP/IP should smoke 
> SAVRSTOBJ.  By things being equal I mean does SNA and TCP/IP use 
> the same line descriptions on both 400's?
> I use SAVRSTOBJ for most of my distribution because I've not 
> written/purchased/downloaded TCP/IP equivalent wrappers.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---