× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Socket vs Data Queue speed (was: Processor speed)
  • From: Pete Massiello <pmassiello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 17:45:41 -0400
  • Organization: OS Solutions International

We have been running a lot of tests on this lately, as our new Visual ShowMe/400
runs either as a Socket connection or a Data Queue connection, and in every time
the socket connection has been much faster.

    Pete

Bob Crothers wrote:

> I missed this statement.  And would love to see some data on it.
>
> Are you measuring the entire transport time?  Eg: From the time the Client
> side sends the request to the AS/400, DQ pgm processes, sends to other DQ,
> and PC gets results back.  And how big the results? And how much data.
>
> I'd be very surprised of the entire data queue process was faster than a
> persistent Socket connection. And do not forget the pain of Client Access.
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On
> Behalf Of Scott Mildenberger
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 1:58 PM
> To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
> Subject: RE: Processor speed
>
> Just curious, do you have any benchmarks or other evidence to back this up?
> I had always thought that sockets would be faster but had never delved into
> it to determine whether that was true or not.  I would be really interested
> in any references comparing the two.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott Mildenberger
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nathan M. Andelin [SMTP:nathanma@haaga.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 8:05 AM
> > To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> > Subject:      RE: Processor speed
> >
> > For example, many ported applications rely heavily on sockets for
> > interprocess communication.  But data queue send and receive functions are
> > twice as fast as socket send and receive.
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
>
>

--
Pete Massiello
OS Solutions International
Phone: (203)-744-7854  Ext 11.
http://www.os-solutions.com
mailto:pmassiello@os-solutions.com


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.