Re: QBASE - QCTL

QBASE was supplied I suspect to make System36 users
feel at home as this is how that machine worked.

The QCTL subsystem was supplied as the default for System 38
machines & allows a better control of system resources for
Interactive and Batch jobs.

Mike





"E.Jahn" <erik.jahn@pvk.cz> on 22/02/2000 09:55:40

Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com

To:   "MIDRANGE Mailing List" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
cc:    (bcc: Mike Barton/Wellingborough/UK/ECSOFT)

Subject:  QBASE - QCTL



Hello all,
I would like to ask for your opinion about controlling subsystems - which is
better to use. Even guys from IBM couldn't give me clear answer.
I definitely prefer QCTL but no one was able to explain me why use QBASE
except simplicity (simplicity without possibility :)  ).
I work on AS/400 5 years and always use QCTL on every machine. My opinion is
that you have larger scale of possibilities how to configure your system.

TIA,

Erik

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---






+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---