× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Maybe you should try using the CRTDUPOBJ command followed by a DLTPGM
command instead of the MOVOBJ command.... 

Kenneth

****************************************
Kenneth E. Graap
IBM Certified Specialist
AS/400 Professional
Network Administrator
NW Natural (Gas Services)
keg@nwnatural.com
Phone: 503-226-4211 x5537
FAX:    603-849-0591
****************************************



-----Original Message-----
From: Allen Overeem [mailto:AOvereem@stvgb.org]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 12:15 PM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: RE: QRPLOBJ Library


Lurton wrote:
____________________________________________________________
If you compile an object (pgm) with replace yes, it will create a duplicate
of the object in QRPLOBJ with a strange name like Q34578ikl.  The original
object name will be in the text. So, if a program is running and you
recompile, the old program will still be in the job stack until the user
ends the program.   The next instances will always get the new program
because the rename process prevents them from calling the old.
__________________________________________________________

Thanks but this is totally unrelated to the situation I am describing.
First of all, the program to be moved or recompiled is NOT running!  Second,
we are forcing the object into qrplobj  with a cl movobj command within our
inhouse software program that we use to do moves and recompiles. The name is
not being changed, there is no Q appended by the system-this is inhouse
software forcing the "move" of the existing object with the same name to
qrplobj just before moving the new object into production.  What I need to
know is what the OS might do with the object because of this force??  Is it
possible that there is a change in the OS between release 2 and 4 (which we
upgraded to just before seeing this strange behavior) that might cause
problems resolving to the "correct" object?? Thanks anyway.

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.