× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: QRPLOBJ Library
  • From: Jim Langston <jlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 13:52:08 -0800
  • Organization: Conex Global Logistics Services, Inc.

I know that sometimes I recompile a program, and people call it
but still get the old version.  Even though they exited the program
and went back in.  The solution is for them to log off and back on.

I *think* that their job still has a copy of the old program in memory,
and it actually runs that instead of loading the program from disk again.
That is just a guess though.

Regards,

Jim Langston

Allen Overeem wrote:

> Lurton wrote:
> ____________________________________________________________
> If you compile an object (pgm) with replace yes, it will create a duplicate
> of the object in QRPLOBJ with a strange name like Q34578ikl.  The original
> object name will be in the text. So, if a program is running and you
> recompile, the old program will still be in the job stack until the user
> ends the program.   The next instances will always get the new program
> because the rename process prevents them from calling the old.
> __________________________________________________________
>
> Thanks but this is totally unrelated to the situation I am describing.  First 
>of all, the program to be moved or recompiled is NOT running!  Second, we are 
>forcing the object into qrplobj  with a cl movobj command within our inhouse 
>software program that we use to do moves and recompiles. The name is not being 
>changed, there is no Q appended by the system-this is inhouse software forcing 
>the "move" of the existing object with the same name to qrplobj just before 
>moving the new object into production.  What I need to know is what the OS 
>might do with the object because of this force??  Is it possible that there is 
>a change in the OS between release 2 and 4 (which we upgraded to just before 
>seeing this strange behavior) that might cause problems resolving to the 
>"correct" object?? Thanks anyway.

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.