Re: Proportion of programming languages on AS400

So I'm wrong again.  No big deal.  It happens a lot.  Used to bother me 
but then I realized it isn't very important anyway.

_______________________
Booth Martin
boothm@earth.goddard.edu
http://www.spy.net/~booth
_______________________




"System Support Products, Inc." <sspi@ix.netcom.com>
Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
11/21/1999 06:48 PM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L

 
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: Proportion of programming languages on AS400

At 2:23 PM -0500 11/21/99, boothm@earth.goddard.edu wrote:
>I swear that I remember this from way back in the early 1970s.  What
>language were they using then?  Isn't C and C++ much newer than the 
1970s?

Booth,

    I don't know about the early 70's, but the System/34 SSP was 
written on a mainframe in SPL, which looks like a macro language that 
generated S/34 assembler.  Of course, the resulting assembler code 
was also complied on the mainframe.

    The System/38 microfiche I have show that a language named PL/MI 
was used, which generated S/38 MI.  I'm not sure if this was a true 
compiler, or a macro processor.  This work was done on a mainframe as 
well.

    Regards,

    - Lou Forlini
      Software Engineer
      System Support Products, Inc.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---