Re: Proportion of programming languages on AS400

oh.  Glad to bring happiness to a curmudgeon.   Was any one part funnier 
than the other parts?

I swear that I remember this from way back in the early 1970s.  What 
language were they using then?  Isn't C and C++ much newer than the 1970s?

_______________________
Booth Martin
boothm@earth.goddard.edu
http://www.spy.net/~booth
_______________________




"Simon Coulter" <shc@flybynight.com.au>
Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
11/20/1999 07:12 AM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L

 
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: Proportion of programming languages on AS400

M
Hello Booth,

That's the funniest thing I've read since Paul Musselmans missive earlier 
this week!

Regards,
Simon Coulter.

«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»
 Reply-To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Cc: none
> Subject: Re: Proportion of programming languages on AS400

> 
> Along these lines, is it Urban Legend that early on all of IBM's 
> programmers wrote  the mid-range system programming in RPG and that is 
the 
> reason it became so tight and well behaved?
> 



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---