× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: V4R3 Y2K PTF's
  • From: John P Carr <jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 08:18:52 -0500

Can anyone give us a synopsis of Y2K issues with V4R3.
We have several US & European systems on this release in a 24 x7 environment
where it is next to impossible to do Cum upgrades easily.  We have been
under the impression that base V4R3 is Y2K compliant.  Should we be
concerned????  Our oldest Cum is 98230. 

These systems are 170's and 720's.  The 720's can be brought to current Cum.
The 170's are much more difficult.  
They are not complicated systems:  IP, SNADS & Client Access running
compliant in-house systems.

TIA

John Carr


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.