IBM documentation

> to another favorite gripe of everybody's... The manuals.... Their tech
> writers are terrible... I'm remember when you had good examples of any
> new feature that was announced and what it could be used for... Now you
> have DIG to even find out a "hint" of what it's really supposed to do,

Be careful with generalizations. Not all IBM tech writers are terrible. Many
AS/400 manuals and documents are well written and easy to understand (the
cody examples, though, are particulary bad). The bigger problem with AS/400
documentation isn't the quality of the documentation itself, it's the
quality of the search engines and indices you use to find stuff. On this
front, IBM's AS/400 efforts are nearly laughable. IBM doesn't seem to
understand that it could use, well, let's see, A COMPUTER, to improve
documentation navigation.

As for DDS specifically, damn shame IBM didn't have a little Y2K-like
problem of their own there. They should have capped DDS keywords when their
number reached 99,999.

rp


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---