× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: 1600 - ,missing days - was Feb 29, 2000
  • From: John P Carr <jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 19:24:41 -0400


>>"Schenck, Don" wrote: 
>> Funny ... I don't REMEMBER 1600 being a leap year ...

>No, it wasn't. But they didn't use leap seconds then either.  ;-)
>The Gregorian calendar had just been introduced that century(!?!? or was
>it the one before?)

Remember that in 173x (close to there)   we lost 3 or 4 days when they
corrected
the calandar.   See if that those missing days are a valid *ISO  date.
They shouldn't
be because they never happened.

John Carr

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.