× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Feb 29, 2000
  • From: "Joe Teff" <jteff19@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:25:12 -0500

I thought the leap year rule stated that any year evenly divisible
by 4 was a leap year unless it was also evenly divisible by 400
and then it wasn't. That would make 1700, 1800 and 1900 leap
years, but 2000 wouldn't be. Yet everywhere I look, it shows a
Feb 29th in 2000 (calendars, PIM software, OS/400 date data
types, etc). I seem remember a thread on this list a while back
and it was stated that 2000 wasn't a leap year. Can anyone set
me straight here.

Joe Teff

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.