Re: QZDASOINIT and ODBC performance

Pete,

  Good point on the time slices, I often to that as well.  We have
found that in general time slices on the newer RISC boxes need to be
whacked by a factor of 10.  These systems are way zippier that the
IMPI boxes those defaults were designed for.

  Any comments on the time slice from Jim 'work management'
Oberholtzer?

  - Larry

Pete Hall wrote:
> 
> We've done this also, but found we also needed to decrease (all) time
> slices from the shipped values by a factor of 10 on a single processor S30.
> ODBC requests now run in their own subsystem at priority 50 with a
> timeslice of 200 and all is reasonably well. We need a processor upgrade
> though.
> 
-- 
Larry Bolhuis         | What do You want to Reload today?
Arbor Solutions, Inc  |
(616) 451-2500        | 
(616) 451-2571 -fax   | Two rules to success in life:
lbolhui@ibm.net       | 1. Never tell people everything you know.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---