× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Y2k, OV/400 & Shared Folders question
  • From: "Neil Palmer" <neilp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 11:32:08 -0400



Your SysOp is confused.  There's no problem with shared folders.
And yes, OV/400 got a reprieve to "the release after V4R4".

    Neil Palmer         DPS Data Processing Services Canada Ltd.
                                             AS/400~~~~~
Markham,  Ontario,   Canada    ___________          ___  ~
Phone: (905) 474-4890  x303   |OOOOOOOOOO| ________  o|__||=
Cell.: (416) 565-1682  x303   |__________|_|______|_|______)
Fax:   (905) 474-4898          oo      oo   oo  oo   OOOo=o\
mailto:NeilP@DPSlink.com    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.DPSlink.com        AS/400  The Ultimate Business Server





"Joe Teff" <jteff19@idt.net> on 99-07-30 09:20:16

Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com

To:   "Midrange Dot Com" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
cc:    (bcc: Neil Palmer/Dpslink)

Subject:  Y2k, OV/400 & Shared Folders question




This was sent to me by a colleague:
>The System Operator told me that we needed to get all
>of our information on the AS/400 in shared folders off
>because IBM would not be making this function Y2K
>compliant. L know that I have heard that Office Vision
>is not going to be converted, but didn't know that shared
>folders were included. I am wondering if she is confusing
>information meant only for the Office Vision programs
>with information that she thinks includes Office Vision and
>Shared Folders.
This client is using V3R7. My first comment was that I was
sure that V3R7 (like V3R2) was Y2K compliant. I also said
that V3R7 is obsolete and should be upgraded to V4. I
told him that I knew nothing of OV/400 not being Y2K
compliant and it was being phased out because Domino
was a much better solution (I also seem to remember a
recent magazine article that said OV/400 had been given
a repreive). I don't see how the demise of OV/400 has
anything to do with the QDLS file system anyway.
Can anyone shed some light here?   TIA
Joe Teff






+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.