AS400 security WAS: Package Vendor that changes IBM command Defaults.

Dean,
  You're right; there are fewer posts on security.  In my prior job, I was
security/database/analyst/help desk/programmer/floor washer.  I had to
understand security as part of what I did.  Here, we have a person who's
dedicated to security concerns, and I rarely get asked security questions
any more.  I wonder if specialisation isn't one reason for the lack of
security related posts?

Buck Calabro

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DAsmussen@aol.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 3:37 AM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: Package Vendor that changes IBM command Defaults.
> 
> Frankly, security matters have been given short shrift around here of
> late.  
> I don't know if this is because of IBM's correction of most of the matters
> at 
> the system level with which we were concerned a few years back, a more 
> knowledgeable user base, or a genuine lack of knowledge among the
> newcomers.  
> It certainly _IS NOT_ because of better vendor implementation of security.
> 
> We used to get two or three posts from Steve Glanstein (our Hawaiian
> security 
> advocate) per week, now we rarely hear from him.  Perhaps more issues like
> 
> this should be raised...
> 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---