× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Joel,

There is a PTF available for V4R3.  It is a known bug.  We experienced
the same exact problem at my last job.

HTH,
John

John W. Cirocco
Director, Information Technology
Pierce & Stevens Corp.
710 Ohio Street
Buffalo, NY 14203
(716) 856-4910 Ext. 201
John_Cirocco@PierceStevens.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: Joel Fritz [SMTP:MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 6:48 PM
To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
Subject: qmqry runs interactively but not in batch


This is an appeal to someone who actually knows something about sql.  All
I
know I learned from rtvqmqry.

The following is a qmqry extracted from a query400 object and given some
parameters.  It runs fine interactively either with message prompting or
by
providing it all the setvar values it needs.  It will not run in batch
when
provided the same setvar values that work interactively.  The error
message
is:  "Message . . . . :   Keyword BY not expected. Valid tokens: FOR WITH
ORDER UNION OPTIMIZE."

The offending query looks like this:

 SELECT


   ALL       T02.ORDTYP, T02.ORD#, T01.VND, T01.ITM, T01.STY, T01.QTYORD,


             T01.LINSTS, LINCST*(QTYORD) AS EXTCST, T01.SHPYR, T01.SHPMD


   FROM      NEWFIL/LIN T01,


             NEWFIL/ORD T02


   WHERE     T01.ORD# = T02.ORD#


     AND    (SRCCD = &S OR SRCCD = &SM)


     AND     SHPYR BETWEEN &Y AND 99


     AND     SHPMD BETWEEN &MD AND 1231


     AND     VND = &V


     AND     ITM = &I


     AND     STY = &SL


   ORDER BY  T01.SHPYR ASC, T01.SHPMD ASC




I know the variable names are cryptic, I tried to shorten them to see if
the
length of the where clause was a problem.  I've also tried passing one
long
string for the where clause which doesn't work because it's over 55
characters.  We're running v4r3 and don't have the full sql package.

I'd be grateful for any insight, even something that begins "Of course it
doesn't work..."
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.