RE: More cycle, yes, more cycle

I've tried messing around with the OVRDBF and I was never able to get it to 
come 
close to matching the efficiency of the cycle.  Still a couple hours difference 
in 
run time.  Besides, might not your blocking factor change every time a file 
layout 
change occurs?  One more thing to look for when you upgrade vendor software.





PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com on 04/10/99 12:01:23 AM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
cc:      

Subject:        RE: More cycle, yes, more cycle

>Why?  because the people that designed the cycle know where all of the
>advantages are, and have >built them in.  Also, blocking is fast.  seek
>time tumbles.


Isn't one of the parameters in OVRDBF to handle blocking?  Wouldn't a CL
wrapper with such overrides let  the do-it-yourself program match blocking
advantage with The Cycle?

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---