× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. January 1999

Use of Timestamp data field How? Is IBM Y2k Compliant 1940 Onwards?

  • Subject: Use of Timestamp data field How? Is IBM Y2k Compliant 1940 Onwards?
  • From: bvining@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jan 99 11:06:03 CST
 
Arghh....

To improve readability, please replace 'timezone' with 'timestamp' in my
earlier append on Timestamp support.  I don't know why I was using the term
timezone in the samples (other than my mind was obviously not completely here).

Bruce

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.