× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: DASD Performance
  • From: Larry Bolhuis <lbolhui@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 17:16:46 -0400
  • Organization: Arbor Solutions, Inc

I hope this is not true.  It was my understanding that in the 'top hats'
there were actually 8 SCSI busses to support the 16 drives.  So even
though only one can be accessed it was per buss.

In the e series boxes it appears that there are up to 5 drives per SCSI
buss (looking at the cabling) but they are Ultra & Wide & Fast so actual
throughput should be similair.

And besides we still get guidlines from IBM that based on model and
feature you need something like x arms for low I/O, x*3 for medium and
x*5 for intense I/O (formula is mine just as an example!).  For an S20
4way I believe the numbers are something like 15, 45, and 70.  Arms DO
matter!

 Larry Bolhuis
 Arbor Solutions, Inc
 lbolhui@ibm.net

DAsmussen@aol.com wrote:
> 
> Hey Folks!
> 
> I heard a _NASTY_ rumor last week, and wanted to confirm it here.  While we've
> had our tuning differences here in the past (I prefer manual tuning, others
> prefer QPFRADJ set on), one thing we've always agreed upon is that the number
> of disc arms is important.  Now I hear that arms are irrelevant on the new
> SCSI-based boxes, because the SCSI architecture will only access one drive at
> a time.  Is this true?  If so, how does one tune hardware under this new
> paradigm?  All the books still talk about arms!!!
> 
> TIA,
> 
> Dean Asmussen
> Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
> Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
> E-Mail:  DAsmussen@aol.com
> 
> "The two hardest things to deal with in life are failure and success." --
> Unknown
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.