Re: members

boothm@ibm.net wrote:

> Someone said the other day that members are dead.  IBM has seen that no one 
>else is going down the members road, so they are pulling back and offering no 
>further support beyond what we see right now.

Sounds like good news to me.  In a well architected database, I have difficulty 
finding a use for members.  In most (if not all) cases you could use a key 
field to get the deliniation that members
provide.

Source files are a different issue, I'm not sure how IBM would ever get away 
from using source members.  It's too deeply embedded in the culture.

jte

>
>
> Does this fit with what others have heard?
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> boothm@ibm.net
> Booth Martin
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---



--
John Earl   PowerTech Toolworks
johnearl@toolnet.com  www.toolnet.com
253-858-7388   206-575-0711
PowerLock Network Security for the AS/400
--




+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---