Schedule job entry verses sbmjob verses interactive job

I have a utility that can seems to behave in two different ways when
submitted using sbmjob and submitted using a scheduled job entry.
Moreover, in some instances the sbmjob does not generate the same
results as an interactive job.

  1) When a submitted from an interactive job using submit job it
appears to work correctly accessing          files in the correct manner
and producing the correct output.

  2) When submitted from a scheduled job entry no output is produced.

I know that when a sbmjob entry is evoked it copies the user environment
and authority well enough.

The schedule job entry has QSECOFR as the user and contains a job
description that would mirror the environment of the interactive job (I
belive with the same library list). Is there a system value that would
be involved here or something else that may cause the schedule job entry
not the correct results. The program also uses QTEMP and shared folders.
What am I missing?

Thanks in advance for any insight on this matter.


Erick
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---