Re: Thin Clients and the AS/400

I am kind of curious as to how many cycles that you'll save from your 400.
Do you have this measured at all?
Is there a possiblility that this may cause slower response time from Notes
users in the future?  Perhaps when you integrate AS/400 data with Notes 
applications?

Yea, we've got a few IPCS's and FSIOP's lying around sucking dust.  What,
with NetServer, Native Notes, Native DNS and many of the other features
available in V4R2 are you going to use an NT server for?  We already have
a CISCO PIX box firewall.  Hey, maybe to run WinCenter on?

SNIP>
> 1)  Why use Notes on the NT IPCS instead of Native on the 400?

I already have an NT server IPCS thats not doing much.  I am not looking
to put it on one of my production AS/400 boxes natively and take
processing cycles away from them.  

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---