× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Design shift of view
  • From: Larry Bolhuis <lbolhui@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:33:36 -0400
  • Organization: Arbor Solutions, Inc

boothm@ibm.net wrote:
> 
> I would think the "battleship" of in-place code and people that understand
> it and it's architecture is so great that only a brand new paradigm with
> brand new people would have any chance of implementation.

  Isn't this how the AS/400 came into being?  Didn't Dr. F NOT learn
computer design on the left or right coast in a big name school so that
he didn't get 'their view' of how a computer should be built?  If you
don't know how something is 'supposed' to be done you have a much
greater chance of doing it a different (albeit not always better) way. 
You may have a fiasco, or produce post-it notes! But at least you won't
get R Admiral Grace Hopper to beat you about the head and shoulders with
a stick either!

  (For those of you who never met the late 'grandma COBOL' she promised
that she would appear next to anyone who heard one of her speaches yet
continued to use the phrase 'because we've always done it that way' and
beat them about the head and shoulders with a stick. And she does. And
it hurts!)

  Larry Bolhuis
  Arbor Solutions, Inc
  lbolhui@ibm.net


> 
> By that, I don't mean the current people wouldn't be able to make the
> shift, just that in their conversations back and forth everything would be
> compared to the same old paradigm, just as was done in this thread a few
> days ago when punch cards were brought in as a way to explain a concept;
> punch cards have been gone for 15+ yeaars at most places.
> 
> In <35BCA7E3.F8E3CB93@ibm.net>, on 07/27/98
>    at 09:16 AM, "James W. Kilgore" <qappdsn@ibm.net> said:
> 
> >There were some soundings about the acceptance of "radical" changes in
> >how we do things.  IMO, radical can be brought to acceptance through
> >logical conclusion and the demonstaration that nothing gets lost and
> >plenty gets gained.
> 
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> boothm@ibm.net
> Booth Martin
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.