RE: what is unclear about 01 02 03 -Reply

Hello Neil,

Yep and when I was hacking rather than designing my old code looked like that 
too!  Most of those tendencies got 
knocked out of me at IBM.

Question for you though; Why did you need the subroutines?  Oh! not enough 
indicators to condition the code.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.

//----------------------------------------------------------
// FlyByNight Software         AS/400 Technical Specialists
// Phone: +61 3 9419 0175      Mobile: +61 3 0411 091 400
// Fax:   +61 3 9419 0175      E-mail: shc@flybynight.com.au
// 
// Windoze should not be open at Warp speed.
 

//--- forwarded letter -------------------------------------------------------
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3)
> Date: Thu, 07 May 98 20:28:18 -0600
> From: "Neil Palmer" <npalmer@NxTrend.com>
> To: "'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
> Reply-To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: what is unclear about 01 02 03 -Reply

> 
> Hey Simon !
> I wrote a program back in the 70's that used all indicators 01-99 - and
> I was DAMN proud of it at the time too !    :-), so then you move on to
> KA-KY, U1-U8, OA, OF, OV, etc. etc. - then you start saving them in one
> byte fields and restoring them for subroutines !
> I think I ran into a problem when I could only AND together 7 lines in
> the calcs ! 
> It was my first RPG program, and I'd taught myself how to wrote it
> reading the manuals on the night shift while I was an operator.
> 
> 
> Neil Palmer                                AS/400~~~~~      

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---