× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> Some time ago, Steve Raisor wrote that his company was considering
> setting the date of their development machine to a year 2000 date.  Other
> list members provided some things to watch out for.  I never read the
> results of that test.  Steve, or anyone who has done this, how did it go?
> Any unforseen problems?
>
> We are going to do this next weekend.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Carol



Check out IBM's web site.  My partner in crime downloaded a 12 page
document IBM has compiled with their warnings about things that can go
worng if you do that!

Most of the problems seem to be caused when things (journal receivers,
files, date entries) are created with 2000+ dates, and will cause problems
when you crank the date back to 'now.'

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.