× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Numerics PACKED, ODD format -- Always recommended?
  • From: Booth Martin <boothm@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 00:36:08 -0500

Bob Crothers wrote:
> 
> Karen,
> 
> Yes, it is best (from a performance point of view) to use odd
> length packed numeric data in your files.


Doesn't db/400 ignore the packed vs. zoned definitions now?  I thought
all numeric fields were packed regardless of what one writes in the dds. 
About the odd vs even issue: if you need 8 characters, then you need 8
at least so you can't go to 7.  My understanding always was that the
cycles for 8 are the same price as the cycles for 9, so the 9th
character is a freebie, excepting dasd.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.