• Subject: Re: Win95 - CA/400 session limit
  • From: Dave Mahadevan <mahadevan@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 14:20:48 -0500
  • Organization: Stoner and Associates

HankHeath@aol.com wrote:

> When the same set up works on Win 3.1 and not on Win 95, I'm supposed to blame
> IBM for not accommodating changes that M$ made and didn't bother to document?
> Sorry, it doesn't wash. But you did a good job of bluffing your way into the
> dialog.

You forget that Win 3.1 is 16 bit and Win95 CA is 32 bit.  IBM did a poor job in
CA Win95 and they are still correcting their mistakes .... now the guy at the 
of the class... how many Service packs have we gone through for CA Win95?--
Thank You.


Dave Mahadevan.. mailto:mahadevan@fuse.net

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page