RE: data queues -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Walden,

At 06:41 PM 1/26/98 -0500, you wrote:
>John,
>
>With a max size of 16Meg do you really care if the data space does not get
>reclaimed? While I don't disagree that a RCLDTAQ, and for that matter a
>DSPDTAQ, command would "round-out" the data queue family, there are a lot of
>things I would rather see IBM spend its time on.

I'm the wrong John :) but yes, you do care.  DTAQ's are revered for their
(relative) speed in program to program communications.  If you let these
things needlessly get into the MB range, you run the risk of harming that
good performance (so says the manual).  Cleanup also lessens your chances of
baddata sorts of errors that, admittedly are rare on the /400, but not
unheard of.

jte

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.