RE: CA/400 CWBLM0006 message

Al,

Don't you mean that Wayne & others have been recommending a higher value
for QMINPWDLEN - the change I am referring to is QMAXPWDLEN that USED to
be shipped as 10, and is now being shipped as 8.

... Neil Palmer                                     AS/400~~~~~      
... NxTrend Technology - Canada     ____________          ___  ~     
... Thornhill, Ontario,  Canada     |OOOOOOOOOO| ________  o|__||=   
... Phone: (905) 731-9000  x238     |__________|_|______|_|______)   
... Cell.: (416) 565-1682  x238      oo      oo   oo  oo   OOOo=o\   
... Fax:   (905) 731-9202         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
... mailto:NPalmer@NxTrend.com          http://www.NxTrend.com


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Al Barsa, Jr. [SMTP:barsa2@ibm.net]
        Sent:   Monday, January 05, 1998 10:19 AM
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        Cc:     WOEvans@aol.com
        Subject:        RE: CA/400 CWBLM0006 message

        At 03:29 AM 1/5/98 -0700, you wrote:
        >This could explain why they are shipping new systems with
QMAXPWDLEN set
        >to 8.
        >I though it had to do with mainframe compatibility - haven't
seen it
        >documented anywhere re CA/400. 

        Security gurus, like Wayne Evans, have been recommending this
for years.

        Al

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---