RE: Problems with QCMDEXC parameter

One of the things we've used is to make the variable 1 bigger than is has   
to be (in your case 257) and put an "X" or something in posistion 257.   
 This way the system will not fill the rest with garbage.


 ----------
From:  Stephen Hunt
Sent:  Tuesday, January 06, 1998 9:12 AM
To:  bvstone
Subject:  Problems with QCMDEXC parameter


Help,

I'm passing a parameter to a CLP that is later used as a command for
QCMDEXC.  The parameter is defined as having a length of 256.  However,
there appears to be a lot of garbage trailing after the value that is
passed.

I'm sure I've seen a workaround for this, but have had no luck in finding
it.

Can anyone help ?

Thanks,

Stephen Hunt
Technical Systems Manager
Harvestime Ltd
EMAIL  deptit@harvestime.co.uk
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to   
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:   
david@midrange.com
+---
uucp


Bradley V. Stone
bvstone@taylorcorp.com
http://prairie.lakes.com/~bvstone/
"I was on fire... and I was dry!"  
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---