Re: Journal ASPs

At 09:47 AM 6/9/97 -0700, you wrote:
>We have 4 AS/400s with 30 - 120 GB of RAIDed DASD on each.  2 of the 4
>systems have journal ASPs.  Ideally we would like to have all 4 systems
>the same.  IBM used to recommend a seperate user ASP for journalling
>for    performance and protection.  Now with RAID they seem to be saying
>that the benefits are no longer there, is that true?  What is your
>experience?  Do you have a seperate user ASP for journalling?  Are you
>going away from or towards journal ASPs?  Is this a decision that you
>can make for all of your systems or do you decide
>system by system?  What do you use as your criteria for creating a
>journal ASP?
>
IBM initially recommended that you put the journal and the journal receiver
objects in an otherwise inactive ASP.  The recommendation for the journal
object was a bad one, and when the AS/400 came out they recommended putting
the journal in the same ASP as the files.

The journal receiver recommendation is still good.

Al



Al Barsa, Jr. - Account for Midrange-L
Barsa Consulting, LLC.  
400 > 390

Phone:  914-251-9400
Fax:    914-251-9406





Private mail should be sent to barsa@ibm.net
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the Midrange System Mailing List!  To submit a new message,   *
* send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe from     *
* this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify            *
* 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.  Questions      *
* should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *