Re: Is anyone using ILE?

  From: Tim Lennon on 19/05/97 11:04
  
  We're using ILE in a very limited scope,mostly with small utility
  and maintenance programs. There are now about fifty modules on
  system, making 25-odd programs. We're also toying with just straight
  compiles of ILE objects.

  I seem to remember an article some time ago in News/400 saying that
  using the default activation group was not very efficient - but I'm
  not sure what the correct thing to do is.

  We (kind of!) understand binding directories, but they're not used
  at all. I think one of the big objections at the moment to ILE is
  that we're still on CISC  - compiles can be painfully slow.

  Tim Lennon.
  Analyst/Programmer. Thomas Miller & Co.
  lennontc@mutual.co.uk
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the Midrange System Mailing List!  To submit a new message,   *
* send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe from     *
* this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify            *
* 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.  Questions      *
* should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *