We do that using the Lot number fields and quantities of 1. Our users
always refer to the serial number, but they are actually using the lot
number field.
Roland Thibault
-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
mapics-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 1:00 PM
To: mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18
Send MAPICS-L mailing list submissions to
mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
mapics-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
mapics-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of MAPICS-L digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. serials within serials? (Michael Ellis)
2. Re: serials within serials? (Dale Gindlesperger)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
message: 1
date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:33:54 -0800
from: Michael Ellis <michael.ellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: [MAPICS-L] serials within serials?
Does anyone have general feedback for me on how to deal with serial
numbers
of subassemblies and serial #'s of finished items?
How do you tie one to the other?
MO's versus usage in Rep schedules?
Interested in dialog with anyone willing about this topic.
midrange.com
