× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Thanks for the feedback. This has been isolated to the order release
process. When we use the order release selection from the MRP menu, the out
put reports show some wierd information. On the report AMI4M - Order Release
Batch Extract and B/M Explosion we will see something like

File - ITMBL    RECORDS TO BE UPDATED    0     RECORDS TO BE ADDED
RESERVE RECORDS ADDED
      POMAST                             0                           67
0
      POITEM                             0                          159
0
        ETC.

But, by the short time it takes to complete the next step in the process and
we see the AMI4N - ORDER RELEASE AND MATERIAL DETAIL UPDATE WE SEE THE
FOLLOWING:

File - ITMBL    RECORDS TO BE UPDATED    7     RECORDS TO BE ADDED
RESERVE RECORDS ADDED
      POMAST                             3                           0
0
      POITEM                             0                           7
0
        ETC.

IN OTHER WORDS, WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS THAT WE NOW HAVE 67 BLANK PO'S IN THE
SYSTEM.

Now it is a problem


-----Original Message-----
From: Konrad Underkofler [mailto:kdunderk@hoshizaki.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:30 AM
To: 'mapics-l@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: Purchase Order Release Process


Jeff,

We have had the same problem on occassion related to EPDM issues.
Have you checked the planned order and requirements file after a
planning run to see if they appear normal? That could isolate it
to either the MRP run or order release. Also, trapping a joblog
from the MRP run could help since MRP is pretty good about sending
messages about errors to the joblog as indivdual errors are
encountered.

The only real strange thing we have seen in MRP R6 is the planning
run status report now does strange things based on effectivity date
in ITMRVx files. The record below is not missing just not active on
the current date in MRP.
                                            PLANNING RECORDS MISSING

 PLANNING WAREHOUSE  1     PEACHTREE CITY MATERIALS 1       SITE  MFG

 -    ITEM    -           -       DESCRIPTION       -        FILE

 7730I3656                SILICONE TUBE  3/16  X 5/16          ITMRVAL0


Hope this helps a little,

Konrad
Hoshizaki America Inc.
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.