RE: Anyone try PTF 3196 for R6 Yet?

Konrad,

We have been at release 6 since Feb 2001, and are not having any major
problems (or are oblivious).  What issues are you having with R6?

We have not applied 3196, but when we apply a CUM CD we found that RPGLE
programs were backleveled.  So before we apply a CUM we DSPOBJD *ALL for
AMALIB to an outfile.  After applying the CD, DSPOBJD again to another file
and compare the two files.  Question any differences in PTF or APAR fields.

Also level 26 of the Client for MAPICS Browser is not sending the unit (of
unit/nature fame) from the requisition over to the PO and those are all
having to be keyed in manually.  So if you do lots of requisitions, wait for
release 28 fix. (27 is already out)

Ann
LeTourneau, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:mapics-l-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Konrad Underkofler
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 5:42 AM
To: 'Mapics-L (E-mail)
Subject: Anyone try PTF 3196 for R6 Yet?


Given the issues we are having with R6 after going live at PTF 2624
and knowing that MAPICS staffed down in this support area, has anyone
applied 3196 yet? If you did apply it, are things worse or better?
And are there any major gotchas?

Regards

Konrad Underkofler
Director of IT
Hoshizaki America

Phone: 770-487-2331 Ext 696

_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.