RE: User ID in the IM Transactions instead of Workstation ID

Same here, no problems with workstation ID and we have exact same setup.

-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:mapics-l-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Strange, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:52 AM
To: mapics-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: User ID in the IM Transactions instead of Workstation ID




:-----Original Message-----
:From: Connie Webb [mailto:cwebb@grahamwhite.com]
:Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:48 PM
:To: 'mapics-l@midrange.com'
:Subject: RE: User ID in the IM Transactions instead of Workstation ID


:DO NOT name the sessions in Client Access. We tried to identify source of
:transactions this way and brought system to its knees. TCP/IP network and
:MAPICS cannot resolve naming issues for multiple sessions on PC with
:different names.  What to do, still an open issue with us also.

Really?  I run 3 Mapics sessions on my pc with CA using asigned workstation
ID's
IE: MIS12, MIS13, MIS14.  All work well and all of my end users have asigned
workstations ID's.
Our Sales Workstation ID's are Sales1 through Sales25.


_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.