RE: win32 update

Thanks, that was instructive. With a road map like this it's never going to be 
1.0. As long as it is working, I don't mind that much. :)

Marc-Antoine Ruel

> -----Message d'origine-----
> DeÂ: linux5250-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux5250-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Scott Klement
> EnvoyÃÂ: 25 fÃvrier, 2005 15:15
> ÃÂ: Linux 5250 Development Project
> ObjetÂ: RE: [LINUX5250] win32 update
> 
> 
> >
> > - go the 1.0 :) I hate 0.x version numbers :)
> >
> 
> Regarding the version numbers.  Here's a link to a very old thread that
> discussed what the versions were supposed to entail (it changed a bit
> later on, though) and also discussed what goals were intended to be met
> before we called it 1.0.
> 
> http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250/199910/msg00034.html
> 
> Please click "thread index" at the top of the message, and then click on
> the other messages in the thread so can see what the responses were.
> 
> 
> --
> This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list
> To post a message email: LINUX5250@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux5250
> or email: LINUX5250-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.