Re: Access with native driver -- JAVA400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Access with native driver
From: Kevin Passey <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:01:18 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

When we did some testing on this back in 2004 the native driver's performance was significantly quicker - of course that may have changed now.

Kevin

On 30/07/2010 16:30, David Gibbs wrote:

Luis Fernandes wrote:

I wanto to create a simple app that run in iseries envoirenment, and access
to the database via netive drivers.

Personally, I always use JTopen instead of the native driver. It makes my environment more consistent. I suspect the performance improvement would not be significant.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Access with native driver , Dan Kimmel

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.