× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Only when it is called from JDBC do we get 1.2 when we call it 
interactively it obeys the system-level SystemDefault.properties, or the 
user-level SystemDefault.properties (if available).

Tried dropping & recreating the procedure many....many...times.  :)

Unfortuntely, it has moved past interesting from our perspective! :)  We 
are closer to annoying!  :)



Bruce Jin <brucej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
08/03/2006 04:17 PM
Please respond to
Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 
<java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 
<java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: Java Stored Procedures






Very interesting!

This means the code is running in a pre 1.4 JVM. But you said you did 
not have jdk 1.2 on the system. Do you have jdk 1.3? When you run Test 
locally on AS400 (which calls SSIAPI) , the statement 
System.getProperty("java.version") produces a “1.4” while the same 
statement in SSIAPI produces a “1.2”?

Maybe try to drop the procedure and recreate it.

Regards.



Scott Jordan wrote:
Hey Bruce!

It blew up when I tried 1.4 code.  :(

Scott



Bruce Jin <brucej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
08/02/2006 09:50 AM
Please respond to
Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 
<java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 
<java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: Java Stored Procedures






How do you know you are getting JDK 1.2 from a remotely called stored 
Procedure?


Scott Jordan wrote:

Hello!

We are writing Java Stored Procedures on V5R1.  Our Java.Version always 

returns 1.2.  However, when we run the same procedure interactively, we 

get JDK 1.4.  We've tried messing with the SystemDefault.properties 
both 



for the system and in the user's directory, as well as QUSER, and even 
QSYS!

We removed JDK 1.2.  We still get JDK 1.2 from a remotely called stored 

procedure.

Has anyone else experienced this?

Thanks!

Scott






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.