JAVA400-L » October 2005

RE: trigger or listener?

Subject: RE: trigger or listener?
From: "Paul Holm" <pholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:28:58 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I think a key question is:  Does OS400 start up a separate JVM instance for
each trigger call.  I’m not sure but I think it might.  I *think I remember
that for Java sql functions it did and resulted in unacceptable performance
in that situation. 

 

Paul Holm
Senior Web Architect
PlanetJ Corp. 
WOW, Web Applications In Under 5 Minutes
HYPERLINK "http://www.gotWebData.net"; \nhttp://www.gotWebData.net

This thread ...

Re: trigger or listener?, (continued)
- RE: trigger or listener? , Ken Slaugh
- RE: trigger or listener? , cornelius, chad
- RE: trigger or listener?, Paul Holm <=
- RE: trigger or listener? , Walden H. Leverich

Prev by Author: RE: Locking records in DB2
Next by Author: RE: Locking records in DB2
Previous by thread: Re: trigger or listener?
Next by thread: RE: trigger or listener?
Index(es):

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact