× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



"cornelius, chad" wrote:
> 
> Barbara,
> 
> I did get the example to work from the link you provided.  However, the
> first call to a Java method still takes around 15+ seconds.  We are using
> JDK 1.4.  I am not sure if that's a problem or not since the JNI Module
> defines OS400_JVM_12.  Do your method calls perform quickly?
> 

Do you mean that after you manually started the JVM, then the first
method call after that took 15+ seconds but subsequent calls were
faster?  I would have expected the "start JVM" part to take 15+ seconds
and then all method calls to be relatively fast.

I don't think there is any way to speed up the starting of the JVM.

JDK 1.4 should be fine with OS400_JVM_12.  The Java invocation API
changed between JDK 1.1 and 1.2, but it's still the same as the 1.2 JDK
for all subsequent JDKs; by defining OS400_JVM_12 you are just saying
you are using the newer form of the invocation API.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.