Re: VAJava???

 IBM will stop supporting VAJ in the near future. WSAD is the replacement of
VAJ. Eclipse is also IBM thing (donated to open source). WSAD is built on
Eclipse. If you don't do EJB and don't care WTE (websphere test env),
Eclipse is a wonder tool in my opinion.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Proctor" <cproctor@gartsports.com>
To: <java400-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:53 AM
Subject: RE: VAJava???


> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Thanks for the input, Dan, but I was under the impression that eclipse was
> just going to incorporate VAJ. Is this not the case?
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eyers, Daniel [mailto:daniel.eyers@honeywell.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 12:51 PM
> To: 'java400-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: RE: VAJava???
>
>
> Chris,
>
> I really dig VAJ but IBM seems to favor Websphere studio (powered by
> eclipse).  I'm still using VAJ but I have
> downloaded eclipse on my home PC.  It even runs in Linux....  However, at
> this point in time, I prefer VAJ.  IMHO, it'
> hard to go wrong with IBM.... (Of course, I never owned OS/2)
>
> dan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Proctor [mailto:cproctor@gartsports.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:44 PM
> To: 'Java400-l'
> Subject: VAJava???
>
>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Hi all,
>
> I'm going to stay out of the heated battle of RPG over Java.... See what
you
> started, Chris? ;-)
>
> Anyway, we're going to be using Java for some of our applications in the
not
> too distant future and I was wondering what the tool of choice is for Java
> developers on the AS/400. Originally, I thought VAJava because it's big
> blue's, but now I'm hearing stories that IBM may not support it in the
> future. This may be way off, and if it is I'd like to get some feedback on
> it.
>
> Thanks  for your input.
>
> Chris
>