Re: no sql-select after sql-update?

On 10/15/2001 at 10:56:21 AM, java400-l-admin@midrange.com wrote:
To be quite honest, I didn't look at your code at all, it was rather
overly complex, and in general, you should try these things
with a simple tables/columns/data when you're focusing
on how the system works.

It will make it much easier on you to figure out how it works
in a simple fashion first, then in you real world environment.

In summary, I think in this case, we want to seperate our concept of reader
and updater, and assign each an appropriate isolation level (that level
may differ from the other).
--- end of excerpt ---

I just wanted to state this to the list.

I didn't mean to imply that Patrick's code was poor, just that
the example was a normal real world case (i.e. the real world
data/classes/methods are complex) where for our own eduction/debug
it would be better being as simple as possible so we can ignore
the data/flow/methods/classes, and focus only on the records/locks.

Didn't mean to offend if I did. Sorry Patrick




In every single ethnic, religious or racial group, there are a
very few truly evil people. For each of those people there
are many, many, many good people.
Assuming anything (evilness or capability for evil) about the
particular group is bigotry and idiocy. Don't do it.  -- Me

Fred A. Kulack  -  AS/400e  Java and Java DB2 access, Jdbc, JTA, etc...
IBM in Rochester, MN  (Phone: 507.253.5982   T/L 553-5982)
mailto:kulack@us.ibm.com   Personal: mailto:kulack@magnaspeed.net
AOL Instant Messenger: Home:FKulack  Work:FKulackWrk