RE: Porting Java applications from the 400 (was: SQL update/inser t for a string contain " ' ")

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> "Practically speaking, how likely is it that I can
>  pick up my Java application, re-do the data access
>  classes and be ready to go?"
>
> The implicit question is "How many Java programmers are doing
> this today?"

Oh oh ... me me .. <waving hands franticly> <grin>

Seriously ... our java based Issue Tracking system has a fully object
oriented database access mechanism (although not very well implemented).
All we have to do to support a new database is change our database "Engine"
class and it works.

I'm currently working on a project to support DB2/400 as a target database
... all I have to do is extend our current DB2 support to accommodate the
400 variations, and it works fine.  Mind you, all the database access is
using JDBC, but there is no requirement for this.

david