I disagree. One problem that is becoming more and more common in our
industry is that people seem to think opinions are as good as fact when it
come to making architectural decisions, and that "easier" is synonymous with
"better".
The truth of the matter is that there are correct and incorrect approaches
to each decision, and only a realistic understanding of the pros and cons
will allow good choices. To say "Stored Procedures is simpler" is very
simplistic and, in many cases, wrong. I'm trying to point out to anyone who
may be reading this that for certain operations, other architectures are
better, and why that is.
I think these discussions are crucial, lest we find ourselves with an
industry crippled with bloated Lotus Notes applications and unmaintainable
EJB/SQL "solutions".
Joe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clapham, Paul
>
>
> This sounds like one of those "Is bread better than cheese" debates. They
> get tiresome quickly, I find.
