RE: Instantiation question

I'll let others answer you question, but I'd like to expand on your
question.

Why do you need to say:

Student show = new Student();

Why not just:

show = new Student();

Is there a case where you would want to do something like:

Student show = new Principal();
or
Principal show = new Student();

Maybe the answer to your original question will answer mine.  :)  I've
always thought that this type of declaration was a bit redundant.

Brad


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bartell, Aaron L. (TC) [mailto:ALBartell@taylorcorp.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 8:52 AM
> To: 'JAVA400-L@midrange.com'
> Subject: Instantiation question
> 
> 
> What does the following statement do in java:
> 
> Student show = new Student();
> 
> Student is a class that has methods that returns info like 
> studentId.  So I
> have a method named getStudentId() that returns an int.
> 
> In my program I reference the method getStudentId() as 
> show.getStudentId
> after I do the above instantiation.  Why do I have to do this 
> vs. doing
> something like Student.getStudentId?
> 
> Does my question make sense?  I didn't want to include the 
> whole programs as
> attachments.
> 
> Aaron Bartell
> +---
> | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
> JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
> +---
> 
+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---