× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: [Fwd: SecureRandom performance]
  • From: "Sims, Ken" <KSIMS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 13:49:06 -0400

Hi Gary -

I'm not aware of any 1.1.8 for the OS/400, but 1.2 is available by PTF.  The
IBM service website is down (AGAIN!), but going back through my old CDs, it
appears that the PTF number is SF55645.  If you install it, afterwards you
should reapply the cume and the Java group PTF.

I think you use a system environment variable to specify which version is to
be the default version.  Someone else will have to give you the details on
that.

Ken


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary L Peskin [SMTP:garyp@firstech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 16:12
> To:   java400-l@midrange.com
> Subject:      [Fwd: SecureRandom performance]
> 
> Oh, also I forgot to mention that we put the latest CUME on this AM and
> re-IPLd.
> This included the latest SF99067 group PTF for Java.
> 
> Gary
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> I'm having a terrible problem with SecureRandom.
> 
> The following program:
> 
>    public class Glptest1 {
>      public static void main(String[] argv) {
>        long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
>        java.security.SecureRandom.getSeed(20);
>        long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
>        System.out.println("Elapsed time = " + (endTime - startTime));
>      }
>    }
> 
> consistently takes 56 - 62 seconds to execute the SecureRandom.getSeed()
> call.  I've checked the PTF Cover Letters and everthing else I could
> think of but don't get a hit.
> 
> (a)  Has anyone else experienced this problem?
> (b)  Can someone try running this on their system and let us know the
> results.
> 
> I'm running on v4r4 with jdk 1.1.7.
> 
> Also, does anyone know if 1.1.8 is available on os/400 v4r4?  If so, how
> do I get it?
> 
> TIA,
> Gary
> +---
> | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
> +---
+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.